←back to thread

663 points duxup | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.295s | source
Show context
Lio ◴[] No.45361891[source]
> Airlines want to remove the requirement to provide automatic refunds when flights are cancelled or significantly altered.

This is wild. Are they really asking to be able to take money for a flight, then cacel it and keep the money? That's crazy.

replies(8): >>45361944 #>>45362031 #>>45362322 #>>45362678 #>>45362710 #>>45362811 #>>45362887 #>>45364684 #
realusername ◴[] No.45362322[source]
I mean, why even bother to run flights at all in this scenario?

They could cancel 80% of flights and keep the rest to pretend they are still an airline.

Cancelations would be more profitable than the flights themselves.

replies(3): >>45362438 #>>45362666 #>>45363188 #
delfinom ◴[] No.45362438[source]
I imagine the class action lawsuits at that point would bankrupt them
replies(2): >>45362543 #>>45362544 #
onlypassingthru ◴[] No.45362544[source]
Presumably pre-emptively nullified by that arbitration agreement when you accepted the T&C to purchase the ticket.
replies(1): >>45363205 #
1. bluGill ◴[] No.45363205[source]
Arbitration is not automatically in their favor. It is cheaper by far than a trial (in most cases), but they need to be at least somewhat fair or the whole thing collapses next time the government changes.