(www.travelandtourworld.com)

663 points duxup | 1 comments | 24 Sep 25 12:30 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source

Show context

bilekas ◴[24 Sep 25 14:22 UTC] No.45360845[source]▶

These two in particular :

> Automatic Refunds for Cancellations

> Transparency of Fees

How does a lawmaker justify this being in the publics interest ? I'm not even joking, I know "well lobbyist going to lobby", but this is a legitimate question. How does a regulatory body say "Yup, that's okay with us to remove" ?

replies(7): >>45361025 #>>45361065 #>>45361878 #>>45362745 #>>45362913 #>>45363164 #>>45366785 #

1. mrguyorama ◴[24 Sep 25 17:07 UTC] No.45363164[source]▶

>>45360845 #

Are you not able to observe the current administration? There's no need to "justify" anything being in the public's interest.

The admin is no longer counting how many people cannot afford food for crying out loud.

The public voted against their interest.

↑

US airlines are pushing to remove protections for passengers and add more fees