←back to thread

663 points duxup | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
egonschiele ◴[] No.45360538[source]
> Family Seating Guarantees: Under current regulations, airlines must ensure that families with young children are seated together without additional charges. This would no longer be guaranteed under the new proposal, meaning families could face extra costs just to sit next to one another.

This one is wild. You want to sit next to somebody's crying 2 year old? Go nuts. Change their diaper while you're at it.

replies(5): >>45360613 #>>45360649 #>>45360734 #>>45361601 #>>45364160 #
AtlanticThird ◴[] No.45360613[source]
I don't think that's what anyone wants. I think they just want families with young children to pay to sit together, like everyone else has to
replies(7): >>45360895 #>>45360899 #>>45360932 #>>45361032 #>>45361090 #>>45361209 #>>45362040 #
mcaravey ◴[] No.45360899[source]
I think that part of the problem is a want versus a need. I don't particularly care if me and my wife don't sit together. We see each other all the time. But I don't want to have my four-year-old sitting in between two strangers, six rows in front of me where I can't see him. That's not fair to the two strangers, but also I don't trust strangers.

I get the idea of paying for the privilege, but at the same time, it's not like they roll out the red carpet for someone who flies with their kids. Pretty much every time that I can remember them ever rearranging seats to get us together, we always wind up sitting in the rows at the very back of the plane close to the bathroom, which is fine with me. If I wanted red carpet treatment, I'd pay for first class for everyone. But I'm not about to do that.

All I do know is that if they were to stop rearranging seats, it would make the frequency of our flying go down quite a bit. At a minimum, if they went that route, I would want there to be a guaranteed payment to be able to get everyone to sit together. That way I can at least plan for the extra cost. Knowing airlines they would probably use a sliding scale based on age or something.

replies(2): >>45361423 #>>45363283 #
euleriancon ◴[] No.45361423{3}[source]
This exactly. For parents it is not a choice, you absolutely must have a parent sitting by a young child. The effect of not automatically putting parent and children next to each other would just be making tickets more expensive for parents.
replies(4): >>45362176 #>>45362341 #>>45362402 #>>45362843 #
unglaublich ◴[] No.45362176{4}[source]
Don't want to play the devils advocate... but if you _must_ sit next to a person in need... you have to reserve the seats. Doesn't matter if it's a child, a dependent parent or a colleague that you need to run through an upcoming presentation with.

Currently, it's just the case that parents get a discount on the seat reservation fee.

replies(2): >>45362270 #>>45362665 #
mothballed ◴[] No.45362270{5}[source]
Easy solution, just charge more for a child than for an adult, no fees needed.
replies(1): >>45362457 #
unglaublich ◴[] No.45362457{6}[source]
Currently children <11yr get a 20-50% discount/subsidy for a seat. So just rectify it to a 100% and give the seat as a bonus instead. Everyone happy?
replies(2): >>45362717 #>>45362872 #
1. mothballed ◴[] No.45362717{7}[source]
Honestly I would be happy if the 5x the price, and I'm a parent. I hate flying with a kid and it would let me convince the wife to drive or take a boat the next time.

I basically only fly with a kid because everyone else is willing to subsidize the massive externality I impose on them.