←back to thread

663 points duxup | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
bilekas ◴[] No.45360845[source]
These two in particular :

> Automatic Refunds for Cancellations

> Transparency of Fees

How does a lawmaker justify this being in the publics interest ? I'm not even joking, I know "well lobbyist going to lobby", but this is a legitimate question. How does a regulatory body say "Yup, that's okay with us to remove" ?

replies(7): >>45361025 #>>45361065 #>>45361878 #>>45362745 #>>45362913 #>>45363164 #>>45366785 #
1. fzeroracer ◴[] No.45361878[source]
Dream: 'This will lower prices for consumers by reducing administrative overhead and allowing for people to select what protections and plans they want for their trip.'

Reality: Tickets all cost exactly the same (because no company is going to willingly take less money) except now you get to pay more for less benefits.