←back to thread

How HubSpot scaled AI adoption

(product.hubspot.com)
71 points zek | 1 comments | 24 Sep 25 14:42 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dangus ◴[24 Sep 25 15:19 UTC] No.45361608[source]▶
The article isn’t providing a lot of convincing data that AI improved much of anything, only that it didn’t cause incidents.

I really don’t understand why AI usage is mandatory for roles. Nobody’s doing anything like that for other productivity tools even when they’re proven to be helpful. Hell, a lot of employers can’t be bothered to provide basics like nice keyboards and monitors that exceed 1080p.

The current era of tech has way too many corporate losers.

replies(5): >>45361841 #>>45361871 #>>45361979 #>>45362080 #>>45365238 #
1. th0ma5 ◴[24 Sep 25 15:36 UTC] No.45361841[source]▶
People that don't code think that something can do code 98% correct is surely better, without seeing the hard enforcement of a 2% error without manual intervention. I think all of the jokes about stupid computers and weird behavior of languages when you use them out of spec (famously labeled wat) gave people the wrong impressions about why those problems exist or how they can or cannot be fixed. You'd think they'd be able to transfer that cynicism quicker to models since they are also dumb computer things but apparently they say "hello" and that is tricking them out of that?