←back to thread

663 points duxup | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
doodaddy ◴[] No.45359838[source]
> Instead of the clear, itemized pricing system that passengers currently rely on, airlines could hide fees until later in the booking process…

They call what we have now “clear”? Where when looking at a page of flights I don’t know how much the multitude of economy/economy+/economy++/premium economy/business/business++ seats will cost until I click on each flight? Where every carrier offers slightly different variations of these seats such that I can’t cross-shop on Google Flights?

Is that the clear and transparent system the airlines are complaining about?

replies(8): >>45359952 #>>45360309 #>>45360355 #>>45360391 #>>45361372 #>>45361916 #>>45362515 #>>45363115 #
JustExAWS ◴[] No.45361372[source]
Well rule #1 is never to book a flight on a third party travel portal. When things go wrong, you now have to deal with the travel portal and the airline.
replies(2): >>45361410 #>>45361458 #
jghn ◴[] No.45361458[source]
Many people will do things like use Google Travel to narrow down an initial set of potential flights based on times & cost, and then go to the individual airlines from there to book things. The GPs post is still a problem in this scenario.
replies(2): >>45361559 #>>45361847 #
1. scarface_74 ◴[] No.45361559[source]
That seems like a Google problem because of a poor interface. Unless you want each airline to standardize their offerings. Even then their would be differences based on loyalty programs, which airline you have a credit card for etc.

The legislation nor the regulations were geared toward third party aggregators.