←back to thread

224 points zekrioca | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.887s | source
Show context
esseph ◴[] No.45340841[source]
My theory is that he wants to use the sale of US fossil fuels to pay off the debt. Maybe that's bogus, just my uneducated opinion!

(I also think it's incredibly shortsighted)

replies(9): >>45340902 #>>45340920 #>>45340988 #>>45341118 #>>45341145 #>>45341186 #>>45341293 #>>45341377 #>>45341917 #
margalabargala ◴[] No.45340902[source]
In terms of being able to pay off a debt, having more resources (power from wind and fossil fuels) is strictly better than less (just the fossil fuels).

So that's not even remotely economically sound or logical.

In conclusion you're probably right.

replies(1): >>45341305 #
bawolff ◴[] No.45341305[source]
I suppose hypothetically if he significantly increased royalties/export fees/whatever and joined OPEC to manipulate the price of oil, it might help.

Obviously that would be crazy.

replies(2): >>45341424 #>>45342022 #
1. margalabargala ◴[] No.45342022[source]
But, like, even in that eventuality, it would be better for the US to have a bunch of wind power so we can export more oil.
replies(1): >>45342335 #
2. esseph ◴[] No.45342335[source]
I agree! I'm just brainstorming at this point but it's basically like guessing in a game of Texas Holdem.