(arstechnica.com)

125 points voxadam | 1 comments | 22 Sep 25 20:09 UTC | HN request time: 0.209s | source

Show context

mindslight ◴[22 Sep 25 20:45 UTC] No.45339244[source]▶

So presumably Rand Paul supports impeachment and conviction, right? The Supreme Council has Decreed that the only possible check on this naked corruption is impeachment by Congress, so you either support impeachment or you're just grandstanding.

replies(2): >>45339347 #>>45339421 #

mothballed ◴[22 Sep 25 21:04 UTC] No.45339421[source]▶

>>45339244 #

The House has the sole power of bringing impeachment, Rand is in the Senate.

If he did the thing you ask, he would just be 'grandstanding' on something he has no vote to bring forward, which your statement would appear to damn him for.

replies(2): >>45339511 #>>45341968 #

1. mindslight ◴[23 Sep 25 01:58 UTC] No.45341968[source]▶

>>45339421 #

It's called building a consensus. Paul has a hell of a lot more input into the impeachment process than most everyone else in the country.

↑

Rand Paul: FCC chair had "no business" intervening in ABC/Kimmel controversy