(arstechnica.com)

125 points voxadam | 3 comments | 22 Sep 25 20:09 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

1. suzdude ◴[22 Sep 25 20:53 UTC] No.45339317[source]▶

He could have said, "No comment'.

But a Project 2025 co-author felt he wanted to illegally use his position in government to silence those who he disagreed with.

replies(1): >>45339769 #

2. donatj ◴[22 Sep 25 21:33 UTC] No.45339769[source]▶

> Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) slammed Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr for policing speech

I don't understand what you're taking from this, and I'm guessing you didn't read it.

replies(1): >>45339856 #

3. mlinsey ◴[22 Sep 25 21:40 UTC] No.45339856[source]▶

GP was agreeing with Rand Paul. Paul was not a Project 2025 co-author, Brendan Carr was

Rand Paul: FCC chair had "no business" intervening in ABC/Kimmel controversy