←back to thread

258 points arnon | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source

https://archive.ph/1G2Ut
Show context
Retr0id ◴[] No.45322476[source]
Has anyone actually measured the true capacity?
replies(1): >>45322624 #
Mistletoe ◴[] No.45322624[source]
https://www.reddit.com/r/Ultralight/comments/1li5rxw/20000ma...

Looks like a guy there measured it and it is 14.7 which is more than I thought it would be.

> So at a nominal 3.7 volts that’s around 14700mAh, which is around 73-74% efficiency. That’s fairly standard. If you perform the same tests with other batteries rated at 20k mAh, you’ll generally see a similar usable capacity.

I was thinking of getting the Haribo one because I like to camp and climb mountains, but I found an old Ravpower battery bank (RP-P819) my Mom got all of us maybe a decade ago and it is 16,750 mAh on the label and weighs 308.5g. I'm not worried about ultralight enough to make that into e-waste and get the Haribo. I guess technology hasn't changed that much with regard to battery packs. The age of the plateau continues.

replies(1): >>45327862 #
coin ◴[] No.45327862[source]
> 20k mAh

Or just write it as 20 Ah (not you, the reddit poster). I suspect people have no concept of SI prefixes. They know that k = one thousand but are unaware that milli is one thousandth.

replies(1): >>45328150 #
1. nwallin ◴[] No.45328150[source]
No he meant 20kmAh. It's rated for a 5km hike, delivering 2 amps the whole time, taking 2 hours. 5*2*2 = 20.

(I wish batteries were just rated in Joules)