←back to thread

258 points arnon | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.256s | source

https://archive.ph/1G2Ut
Show context
Zanni ◴[] No.45322277[source]
Why your [ultra-light hiker] friend suddenly has [the world's lightest] power bank.

I remember Colin Fletcher, years ago, writing in The Complete Walker about trimming the borders off his paper maps to save weight, which seemed like an insane over-optimization to me. But then, I'm not an ultralight hiker.

I am impressed folks are getting their loads down to 10 pounds though.

replies(9): >>45322529 #>>45322596 #>>45322931 #>>45323097 #>>45323399 #>>45326736 #>>45327049 #>>45327907 #>>45332652 #
JohnFen ◴[] No.45322529[source]
That insane over-optimization is how folks are getting down to (and below) 10 pounds.

I'm not even remotely an ultralight backpacker, but I do count ounces (no matter what your weight limit is, you can't escape making tradeoffs to stay within it). Your hiking load is a great example of how quickly apparently insignificant quantities can add up. Saving fractions of an ounce multiple times gets you large savings far more quickly than you'd think.

replies(4): >>45323118 #>>45326727 #>>45329555 #>>45332275 #
1. anonymars ◴[] No.45323118[source]
The topic reminds me of the .NET core peanut butter improvements:

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/performance-improvemen...