←back to thread

1311 points mriguy | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.414s | source
Show context
bhouston ◴[] No.45308820[source]
This is actually smart. Many H1B visas are used to undermine fair labor wages for already local talent. We should ensure that H1B visas are for actual unique talent and not just to undercut local wages.

H1B is ripe with abuse - this article by Bloomberg says that half of all H1-B visas are used by Indian staffing firms that pay significantly lower than the US laborers they are replacing:

- https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-h1b-visa-middlemen-c...

replies(16): >>45308851 #>>45308895 #>>45308920 #>>45308959 #>>45308961 #>>45309096 #>>45309181 #>>45309231 #>>45309383 #>>45309470 #>>45309492 #>>45309522 #>>45309678 #>>45309878 #>>45310172 #>>45310539 #
vasilipupkin ◴[] No.45309181[source]
this is not smart. If you want to reform an H1B program, reform it. This is not a reform, this is a bizarre attempt to do what? stop companies from hiring foreigners? they will simply hire them in their foreign offices or offshore.
replies(2): >>45309219 #>>45310602 #
fastball ◴[] No.45309219[source]
What is reform and what is not reform? This is a change, not a cancellation. That sounds like reform to me.
replies(3): >>45309348 #>>45309545 #>>45309589 #
cmurf ◴[] No.45309589[source]
Reform is done legally. The statute this falls under requires the fee be based on the administrative cost to process the application.

Changing the statute requires Congress to act.

replies(1): >>45309733 #
fastball ◴[] No.45309733[source]
So if congress passed a law to impose a $100k fee it is reform? That is the only aspect that is concerning?
replies(1): >>45313022 #
1. cmurf ◴[] No.45313022[source]
Yes. No.
replies(1): >>45314436 #
2. fastball ◴[] No.45314436[source]
I don't think that is true from the perspective of the initial comment I was replying to. Clearly the crux of their concern was not "this ain't an act of congress".