←back to thread

1202 points mriguy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
suriya-ganesh ◴[] No.45306489[source]
Interesting decision. I'm on the F1 -> H1B pipeline myself as a software engineer. And my wife is a researcher working on Genetic Engineering.

Of the both of us, I've been the strong proponent for moving the US. and with each passing day, its getting harder to make a strong case for the pain, and uncertainty of moving here.

Lately everything has been counter to what one would expect from a pro-growth, accelerationist country. But I understand where the reasoning is coming from, though.

replies(4): >>45306535 #>>45306787 #>>45307410 #>>45308451 #
fred_is_fred ◴[] No.45306535[source]
with each passing day, its getting harder to make a strong case for the pain, and uncertainty of moving here.

That is exactly the goal here by this administration.

replies(1): >>45306563 #
dyauspitr ◴[] No.45306563[source]
Shutting down the H1B is the end of the American success story. First generation immigrants have started the majority of our unicorns.
replies(2): >>45306790 #>>45306838 #
halfmatthalfcat ◴[] No.45306790[source]
So there were no American immigrant success stories pre-1990, when the H-1 program started?
replies(3): >>45306844 #>>45307461 #>>45308169 #
kelnos ◴[] No.45307461[source]
The H-1 program started as a "correction" to the tightening of immigration rules as a whole over time.

Consider that, in 1905, my great-grandfather got on a boat in Italy, sailed across the Atlantic, arrived in New York, went through a very simple immigration process on-site, and at that point was legal to live and work in the US for as long as he wanted. He eventually naturalized as a US citizen in 1920, only needing to prove his residency and present the record of his legal entrance 15 years prior.

We're a long way from that state of affairs now. The H-1 program was developed because we weren't getting enough of an influx of skilled work due to the reduction in immigration caused by new, more-restrictive immigration laws enacted over the prior decades.

replies(1): >>45311223 #
1. tho2i3423o42342 ◴[] No.45311223[source]
Yes, but race was also very very central then,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1907_Bellingham_race_riot

(and even with that regime, Italians/Irish/Catholics etc. were discriminated LOL).

Today, US is forced to comply with anti-racial position so it can't quite do what it really wants - to open the doors to white-immigrants but to restrict it to everyone else. This happens in the background with the way the green-card process is structured, but frankly, I think everyone is well-served if we stop this farce and just have racial quotas. US empire is failing, so there's no need to keep up such pretences today.

There's quite a bit of research on how anti-racism was a strategy adopted by the US/West after WW2 to prevent the then freed countries (starting with India ironically) from seeking revenge for the centuries of total devastation and mass violence imposed on them.