←back to thread

468 points speckx | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
ComputerGuru ◴[] No.45304167[source]
Guys, don’t take the claim so literally. He’s a successful tech poster. He makes good money showing off his purchases the good money complaining about how expensive they were.

But certainly don’t imitate his choices, his economics aren’t your economics!

replies(5): >>45304175 #>>45304482 #>>45304746 #>>45304813 #>>45305353 #
esskay ◴[] No.45304746[source]
Thats pretty much a given, but what the real takeaway should be from most of the content is that whatever you are doing, these days the answer in all likelihood is not to buy a raspberry pi. It's specs to price just do not add up at all anymore, and it's looking like a pretty damn stagnant place these days.
replies(1): >>45304958 #
Computer0 ◴[] No.45304958[source]
What if you need ARM? What is the best sub $100 sbc that I am missing? Orange Pi hardware always looks good but I hear a lot of negativity about the software that I don't really experience with Raspbian.
replies(2): >>45305192 #>>45311108 #
michaelt ◴[] No.45305192[source]
Then you should take a good hard look at older, much cheaper Raspberry Pis.

Then look at Apple’s ARM offerings, and AWS Graviton if you need ARM with raw power.

If you need embedded/GPIO you should consider an Arduino, or clone. If you need GPIOs and Internet connectivity, look at an ESP32. GPIOs, ARM and wired ethernet? Consdier the the STM32H.

Robotics/machine vision applications, needing IO and lots of compute power? Consider a regular PC with an embedded processor on serial or USB. Or nvidia jetson if you want to run CUDA stuff.

And take a good hard look at your assumptions, as mini PCs using the Intel N100 CPU are very competitive with modern Pis.

replies(4): >>45305956 #>>45307282 #>>45308722 #>>45309301 #
greenavocado ◴[] No.45308722[source]
N100s absolutely curb stomp Pis and have very good video hardware encoders/decoders to boot
replies(1): >>45309984 #
1. jaredhallen ◴[] No.45309984[source]
A different thread on here the other day seemed to come to the consensus that if you're considering an N100, you may as well go with a low end Ryzen. And for much the same reasoning being used here. Seems to be a little bit of a slippery slope.
replies(3): >>45311070 #>>45339968 #>>45367788 #
2. c0wb0yc0d3r ◴[] No.45311070[source]
If you or someone can find that thread I would find it an interesting read.

My cursory research indicates that a low end ryzen would make sense if you are building the board yourself. Right now, I haven’t found a new ryzen mini pc sub 200$. New N100 minis can be had for 150-175$, and if you don’t care so much about power N95 minis are even cheaper.

3. Computer0 ◴[] No.45339968[source]
I have looked at it extensively and the Ryzen never is available at the pricing of an n100. Though it would offer a lot more performance.
4. greenavocado ◴[] No.45367788[source]
Low end Ryzens are too big.