←back to thread

1233 points mriguy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.495s | source
Show context
osnium123 ◴[] No.45308760[source]
Won’t this mean that companies will move jobs to India, China or even Canada?
replies(14): >>45308777 #>>45308780 #>>45308791 #>>45308829 #>>45308836 #>>45308840 #>>45308849 #>>45308865 #>>45308877 #>>45308884 #>>45308965 #>>45309521 #>>45309874 #>>45310296 #
LPisGood ◴[] No.45308777[source]
Why did they not do that before, if it was feasible?
replies(7): >>45308792 #>>45308797 #>>45308932 #>>45308943 #>>45309064 #>>45309088 #>>45309572 #
Aeolun ◴[] No.45308797[source]
It didn’t save them 100k/worker per year at the time. That is a lot of motivation.
replies(3): >>45308813 #>>45308832 #>>45310211 #
LPisGood ◴[] No.45308813[source]
Hiring non-H1B visa workers would also save them 100k/worker.
replies(2): >>45308847 #>>45308872 #
LeoPanthera ◴[] No.45308872[source]
H1B hires are already expensive. Most large tech companies spend quite a lot on legal services.

The assumption that a lot of people make, apparently including Trump, is that companies are hiring H1B for no good reason. Or maybe because they think it's cheaper? It's not. In virtually all cases, H1B hires are because there simply aren't any suitable American applicants with the necessary skills.

replies(3): >>45308918 #>>45309032 #>>45309185 #
LPisGood ◴[] No.45309032[source]
> In virtually all cases, H1B hires are because there simply aren't any suitable American applicants with the necessary skills.

I don’t believe that at all. I believe the opposite, in fact. How do we decide who is right?

replies(1): >>45309672 #
1. LeoPanthera ◴[] No.45309672[source]
I suppose we are about to find out.