←back to thread

417 points sampo | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.405s | source
Show context
corygarms ◴[] No.45302603[source]
This is nuts. If I'm understanding correctly, the M. ibiricus queen mates with a M. structor male, uses his sperm to create sterile, hybrid female worker ants for her colony, then she (astonishingly) can also lay eggs that develop into fertile M. structor males, which means she has removed her genetic material from the egg and effectively cloned the male she previously mated with.
replies(8): >>45302659 #>>45302788 #>>45303102 #>>45303712 #>>45303759 #>>45303836 #>>45310163 #>>45311222 #
alphazard ◴[] No.45303102[source]
If you take the idea of genes as the target of evolution seriously, then every possible "bargain" between different genes that moves towards a pareto optimal for those genes, will eventually be discovered through the brute force search.
replies(7): >>45304037 #>>45304096 #>>45304269 #>>45304909 #>>45305479 #>>45308108 #>>45308418 #
IAmBroom ◴[] No.45304037[source]
Assuming no extinction, climate change, nor heat death of the universe.

Evolution is not a particularly fast optimizer, on the scale of human perception.

replies(2): >>45309622 #>>45312023 #
1. heavyset_go ◴[] No.45309622[source]
Evolution as we know it works on Earth because it is a relatively protected and stable environment, giving genes the time they need to explore a space and adapt to the relatively slow and small changes on Earth.
replies(1): >>45311214 #
2. NonHyloMorph ◴[] No.45311214[source]
Imho genes are not what if at all should be attributed aggncy here (that might, if at all, be the decentralised sympoietic process of ecosystems)

Just wanted to add this, i see where the formulation is useful as a figure of speech.