←back to thread

1233 points mriguy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.281s | source
Show context
rideontime ◴[] No.45308805[source]
Bit ridiculous that this article leaves as a footnote that this rule change is illegal and likely to be struck down by the first lawsuit.
replies(6): >>45308841 #>>45308854 #>>45308873 #>>45308999 #>>45309092 #>>45309490 #
paxys ◴[] No.45308854[source]
The trump administration has not complied with any unfavorable court ruling about immigration why would they care about this one?
replies(2): >>45308899 #>>45308906 #
1. rayiner ◴[] No.45308906[source]
The one ruling they arguably didn’t comply with was overturned by the Supreme Court, who held the district court didn’t even have jurisdiction in the first place.