←back to thread

429 points saeedesmaili | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.937s | source
1. kid64 ◴[] No.45308630[source]
'It may sound obvious but the primary way we reduce the risk of supply chain attacks is to avoid depending on third-party code."

What a horribly disingenuous statement, for a product that isn't remotely usable without 3rd-party plugins. The "Obsidian" product would be more aptly named "Mass Data Exfiltration Facilitator Pro".

replies(2): >>45308653 #>>45312733 #
2. freddie_mercury ◴[] No.45308653[source]
I've used Obsidian for years without a single 3rd party plugin.

It is possible to make your same point without histrionic excess.

replies(1): >>45310180 #
3. kid64 ◴[] No.45310180[source]
Yeah, this is always the response. Usability can be assessed objectively, so you just have low standards.
replies(1): >>45310958 #
4. Capricorn2481 ◴[] No.45310958{3}[source]
I have to agree that I don't find plugins necessary, and I'm not sure why you're so down on people using a solid backlinking note taker. I don't think I have low standards, I think Roam and Logseq aren't that great and Obsidian is all I need.
5. gkbrk ◴[] No.45312733[source]
> a product that isn't remotely usable without 3rd-party plugins

That's not even remotely true. Obsidian out-of-the-box is very usable, covers pretty much all use cases for a note-taking software.

I've been using it for ages, and I haven't needed to turn on the Community Plugins switch for anything.

Usually the people I see with tons of Obsidian plugins are people who think "just one more plugin" is what stands between them and productivity.