←back to thread

335 points coloneltcb | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.506s | source
Show context
badlibrarian ◴[] No.45301736[source]
A search for "Internet Archive rumors" returns a copy of Fleetwood Mac "Rumours" on my first page of results. Playable in browser and downloadable in high-quality lossless format.

The book lawsuit was over current titles (not really archival and preservation), and the record lawsuit wasn't really about the rare 78s, it was about the modern Jimi Hendrix and Paul McCartney records that somehow slipped in. And their refusal to follow the modern law that they themselves celebrated that made what they're trying to do (including downloads) explicitly legal. But that law prohibited fundraising, and they couldn't resist tweeting out links to Frank Sinatra records with a big banner on top asking for money.

In both lawsuits the discovery revealed tech debt and sloppy process at the Archive that made it impossible for them to argue on behalf of the future we all want.

replies(7): >>45302385 #>>45303142 #>>45305081 #>>45305520 #>>45306608 #>>45311022 #>>45313322 #
rtkwe ◴[] No.45305081[source]
> not really archival and preservation

The trick is you want them to be archived now when they're readily available not years from now when they're hard or impossible to find. The difficulty is justifying holding on to them that long when they can't be accessed and deciding when they should be exposed.

replies(2): >>45308306 #>>45310830 #
1. mycall ◴[] No.45308306[source]
Also environmental conditions (ie. fires) can ruin physical archives in the long run.
replies(1): >>45312924 #
2. badlibrarian ◴[] No.45312924[source]
No joke: the Internet Archive's physical archives are stored within the blast radius of an oil refinery. Also in a part of town where the charter warns not to expect prompt emergency services in the event of a natural disaster.