←back to thread

394 points saeedesmaili | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
1. montroser ◴[] No.45308093[source]
This is obviously the way to do it, assuming you have the skills and resources to operate in this manner. If you don't, then godspeed, but you have to know going in that you are trading expediency now for risk later. Risk of performance issues, security vulnerabilities, changes in behavior, etc. And when the mess inevitably comes, at whatever inopportune time, you don't really get to blame other people...