←back to thread

279 points petethomas | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.405s | source
Show context
pinkmuffinere ◴[] No.45298755[source]
It’s tempting to see things like this and think “well of course it does, because that’s how we evolved”. But I think that might just be post-rationalization? At the very least, I think the argument _doesn’t_ hold for periodic famine, extreme temperatures, most disease, etc even though we also evolved with those things. Is there any guiding principle that separates the things-we-evolved-with-that-are-good vs the -that-are-bad? Or is it really just a case-by-case examination?
replies(5): >>45298762 #>>45299023 #>>45299467 #>>45299663 #>>45304373 #
brightball ◴[] No.45304373[source]
Since I was a little kid I was always skeptical of slathering something all over my body just to go outside. Just thought…how did people survive before this stuff if we really need it so bad.
replies(12): >>45304403 #>>45304421 #>>45304484 #>>45304495 #>>45304592 #>>45304894 #>>45305979 #>>45306448 #>>45306482 #>>45308405 #>>45309932 #>>45311267 #
throwaway74628 ◴[] No.45304484[source]
Slathering oneself in mud if you need to endure harsh sun exposure is the most common answer I’ve seen to this question. Otherwise, I agree with your comment, the “best practice” of avoiding sun exposure is as unintuitive as the grain-heavy food pyramid.
replies(1): >>45307274 #
1. jerlam ◴[] No.45307274[source]
That food pyramid hasn't been recommended in 20 years.
replies(1): >>45307500 #
2. throwaway74628 ◴[] No.45307500[source]
That’s my point.