←back to thread

1245 points mriguy | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mister_mort ◴[] No.45306080[source]
If this is truly per application, the companies that try to boost their chances with the lottery by creating multiple applications for the same person are going to get hit hard. Phantom companies that only exist on paper so people can tweak the probabilities are now liabilities.

We'll see a rebalancing for sure.

replies(4): >>45306239 #>>45306292 #>>45308711 #>>45308880 #
DeRock ◴[] No.45306292[source]
> the companies that try to boost their chances with the lottery by creating multiple applications for the same person

This was already addressed by changing the odds to be per unique candidate, not application, thereby reducing the incentive to game it. More context here: https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/news-releases/uscis-announces...

replies(1): >>45306442 #
namirez ◴[] No.45306442[source]
Unfortunately that doesn't work in practice since the consulting firms submit multiple applications for multiple candidates to get one candidate in. I believe charging extra for each application is a good way to discourage this practice but I'm not sure if $100k is the right number or not. To me it seems a bit too high.
replies(2): >>45306643 #>>45306691 #
1. sbmthakur ◴[] No.45306691[source]
Wasn't the application linked to the candidate's passport number?
replies(1): >>45306766 #
2. namirez ◴[] No.45306766[source]
Again, it doesn't matter. You could apply for 100 candidates hoping to get one candidate accepted. For these firms, individual candidates don't matter. They want to get X number of cheap employees into the US per year. And they never file for a green card.