←back to thread

112 points ewf | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
rishi_rt ◴[] No.45305201[source]
Aravind Narayanan seems to be the only guy qualified enough to be called an expert.
replies(3): >>45305738 #>>45305888 #>>45306515 #
1. red75prime ◴[] No.45306515[source]
Expert futurologist? Anyway. The article has very little substance. "See those ridiculous predictions," mostly. If there's anything about fundamental or practical limitations of the current machine learning approaches (deep learning, transformers, RL, and so on), I haven't seen it.