Most active commenters
  • llm_nerd(3)
  • kelnos(3)

←back to thread

1233 points mriguy | 24 comments | | HN request time: 1.631s | source | bottom
1. givemeethekeys ◴[] No.45305996[source]
It hasn't happened yet. All the big money in America says that it will either never happen or won't last longer than a few weeks.
replies(6): >>45306096 #>>45306099 #>>45306201 #>>45306676 #>>45306686 #>>45312454 #
2. famerica ◴[] No.45306096[source]
Anyone who has been paying attention to anything could tell you the same thing.
3. lastofthemojito ◴[] No.45306099[source]
The TACO president doesn't just back away from a bad idea without announcing he got something in return. He'll declare exemptions or delays for companies or industries that kowtow to him in some way - maybe he'll demand these companies make contributions to "non-woke" engineering universities or remove "DEI hires" from their boards, who knows.
replies(1): >>45306411 #
4. aylmao ◴[] No.45306411[source]
Unrelated, but I don't get the "taco" thing. I'm Mexican— it's a head-scratcher that people use the name of our food as an insult to Trump. He doesn't look like a taco, and the acronym is a sentence, not an adjective/phrase, so it doesn't make much sense spelled out in most contexts.
replies(7): >>45306534 #>>45306538 #>>45306545 #>>45306734 #>>45306871 #>>45308254 #>>45309902 #
5. SpicyLemonZest ◴[] No.45306534{3}[source]
It has a lot of memetic value as a callback to a widely discussed Cinco de Mayo tweet he made in 2016 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/72829758741824716...).
6. Multicomp ◴[] No.45306545{3}[source]
taco is an acronym that stands for the phrase trump always chickens out, it was coined or popularized earlier this year when Trump backed off of The Liberation Day tariff stuff when the bond market got nervous.
7. giveita ◴[] No.45306638{4}[source]
Dog whistle?
replies(1): >>45307744 #
8. llm_nerd ◴[] No.45306676[source]
Eh, Trump's administration is so cravenly corrupt and incompetent in every facet and manner that I think it will happen, purely because it's one of those "throw 'em a bone" tactics for the commoners. It's the same reason the aggressive ICE actions have redoubled.

And FWIW, I think the H1B program, like the TFW program in Canada, is outrageously corrupt and has zero legitimacy, and the laughable foundations that people use to justify it -- namely a completely unsubstantiated labour shortage -- is such a ridiculous lie that it deserves to be obliterated. It is a way for the ultra-rich to stomp on worker rights and compensation.

replies(1): >>45307767 #
9. charles_f ◴[] No.45306686[source]
I'm not saying that I don't agree with the apparent logic, but the same argument was made about tariffs, yet here they are and there they staid.
replies(1): >>45307726 #
10. adleyjulian ◴[] No.45306734{3}[source]
RINO republicans don't look like rhinoceros. That the word makes no sense by itself means that you'd have to ask what they meant by it. If the acronym were "DUMB" or "CLOWN" or whatever then I don't think it'd stand out as much.

Also, you're right that it's often used in a way that wouldn't make sense grammatically if it were written out, but that's true for most acronyms I think; e.g. JPEG or GIF.

"Look at this funny Graphics Interchange Format I just sent you!"

11. syspec ◴[] No.45306871{3}[source]
You should hear the long form of the acronym!

TACOBELL

- Trump Always Chickens Out Before Eventually Losing Loudly

12. kelnos ◴[] No.45307726[source]
> the same argument was made about tariffs

By all accounts those arguments were pretty correct, no? The tariff rollout was delayed multiple times, changed multiple times. What we have now doesn't very much look like what Trump announced back in March/April.

And the tariffs may disappear soon, depending on SCOTUS. Not that I depend on SCOTUS doing the right thing anymore, but I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised on this one.

replies(1): >>45311058 #
13. kelnos ◴[] No.45307744{5}[source]
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
replies(1): >>45307925 #
14. kelnos ◴[] No.45307767[source]
> I think the H1B program [...] has zero legitimacy

That's demonstrably false, even just by my own experience with people, so not sure I can take what you're saying seriously.

Yes, there's corruption and abuse, but I've also worked with some fantastic, excellent, smart, ambitious, hard-working people on H-1B visas. They would not have been in the US without it.

I've also worked with some mediocre fools who were on H-1B visas. That's the problem we should be focusing on, and there's no need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

replies(1): >>45310683 #
15. giveita ◴[] No.45307925{6}[source]
Well it aint a shibboleth either.
16. fooker ◴[] No.45308254{3}[source]
> He doesn't look like a taco

Now that you say, I can see some similarities with Al Pastor.

17. aylmao ◴[] No.45309902{3}[source]
Surprised I'm getting downvoted by this.
18. pratyushnair01 ◴[] No.45310683{3}[source]
I think there's a lot of visible frustration (and sometimes racism) in tech discussions online, due to the bad economic climate. This is visible across different platforms. In the past year, I've seen massive rise in people making outlandish claims like this. I expect the trend will grow and soon they'll find a new scapegoat.
replies(1): >>45312533 #
19. SpicyLemonZest ◴[] No.45311058{3}[source]
Huh? What we have now looks almost exactly like what Trump announced back in April, except for the (admittedly important) USMCA exemption. What other differences do you perceive?
20. password54321 ◴[] No.45312454[source]
The cat is out of the bag. Either tension is going to keep rising on their country turning into an all you can eat buffet or something is going to change fast. This is not nothing.
21. llm_nerd ◴[] No.45312533{4}[source]
Okay, if that's my bias -- if you think you get to casually wave off positions as emotional instead of the objective truth it is -- then what is your bias?

From your minimal activity on here it seems that you're Indian. Do you think you have an objective, ground-truth position on the H1B program?

As to the "scapegoat", if there is a bad economic climate, it's simply obvious that the purported labour shortage is no longer the justification, doesn't it? You don't have to scapegoat to point out that a program contingent on an economic condition needs to change when the condition changes.

replies(1): >>45313123 #
22. pratyushnair01 ◴[] No.45313123{5}[source]
Calm down my friend, this isn't a personal attack!

I'm neither in the US nor do I work for a US company, so granted, I personally don't have much skin in the game, and yes I don't have objective, ground-truth position, like you do, but you fail to notice the comment I was replying to, which was simply pointing out blanket statements, namely this:

> I think the H1B program [...] has zero legitimacy

I take it me being Indian doesn't sit right with you, considering you're Canadian yourself. Now as for my bias, I'm frustrated by the rampant racism piggybacking on the singular fact that the majority H1B visa holders are Indian, which comes back to my point: there is a lot of perfectly understandable frustration surrounding H1B, but does this make the racism alright?

Is H1B exploited? Yes. Are ALL H1B engineers good for nothing, wage slaves? Probably Not.

Now, FWIW, the company I work (not WITCH) for has sales engineers in US who are under H1B, so yes, I can claim that the legitimacy of H1B is in fact, non-zero.

As for the "scapegoat", I've seen discussions go from "DEI" and "woke" taking away jobs to "H1B Indians". I'm sure there will be someone else to blame once all the H1Bs are "evicted".

replies(1): >>45313696 #
23. llm_nerd ◴[] No.45313696{6}[source]
> Calm down my friend, this isn't a personal attack!

How is this remotely appropriate to my reply, beyond a rather transparent attempt to taint readers?

> I take it me being Indian doesn't sit right with you, considering you're Canadian yourself.

Another incredibly weird comment, again wholly inappropriate. Does this tactic actually work?

Indians have a significant bias on this and similar topics, and given that there are several hundred million English speaking Indians online, their presence is seen in every discussion. It is always some manner of "this is good for you and it's racism if you oppose it" (which is a rather ironic given the incredible racism that Indians are often observed plying when they do get to the West).

> the company I work (not WITCH) for has sales engineers in US who are under H1B, so yes, I can claim that the legitimacy of H1B is in fact, non-zero

Instead of hiring Americans to staff an American sales office, they parachute an army of Indians into the US to use US systems to undercut Americans? This is precisely the illegitimate use of H1Bs, so what an incredible claim.

Regardless, I have no idea why you've become so angry and racist about this. Is it because you hate Canadians? Weird. Hey look, I can do that ignorant tactic to divert from the discussion as well.

> As for the "scapegoat", I've seen discussions go from "DEI" and "woke" taking away jobs to "H1B Indians".

Almost as if it's a complex and multifaceted conversation? Some are diversions, some are legitimate grievances, and again that is just nonsensical distractions. If the economic climate is bad, which you specifically said, programs like the H1B should be winnowed down to the truly exceptional. Which obviously includes zero "sales engineers".

replies(1): >>45314097 #
24. foldr ◴[] No.45314097{7}[source]
Compare your comment here to pratyushnair01's original comment in this thread. You are only proving their point.