←back to thread

335 points coloneltcb | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
badlibrarian ◴[] No.45301736[source]
A search for "Internet Archive rumors" returns a copy of Fleetwood Mac "Rumours" on my first page of results. Playable in browser and downloadable in high-quality lossless format.

The book lawsuit was over current titles (not really archival and preservation), and the record lawsuit wasn't really about the rare 78s, it was about the modern Jimi Hendrix and Paul McCartney records that somehow slipped in. And their refusal to follow the modern law that they themselves celebrated that made what they're trying to do (including downloads) explicitly legal. But that law prohibited fundraising, and they couldn't resist tweeting out links to Frank Sinatra records with a big banner on top asking for money.

In both lawsuits the discovery revealed tech debt and sloppy process at the Archive that made it impossible for them to argue on behalf of the future we all want.

replies(7): >>45302385 #>>45303142 #>>45305081 #>>45305520 #>>45306608 #>>45311022 #>>45313322 #
NemoNobody ◴[] No.45303142[source]
"Somehow slipped in" - are you fr rn?

I don't wonder anything about that, was very convenient.

replies(1): >>45305275 #
aerostable_slug ◴[] No.45305275[source]
Are you claiming the copyright holders put them there?

You might want to be specific about which ones were some kind of false flag conspiracy plot (is it just "Rumours"?) because there are thousands and thousands of pirated pieces of media on archive.org. I am behind there being some kind of archive project but as things stand the site was/is just Mega with a veneer of respectability.

replies(2): >>45305414 #>>45305755 #
1. badlibrarian ◴[] No.45305414[source]
Internet Archive continues to leak the verified email address of the uploader of each item, so conspiracy guy can run a spot check should he so desire.
replies(1): >>45307281 #
2. xp84 ◴[] No.45307281[source]
Fair if true, though it's not like someone uploading things to IA is likely to be using an address like michael.scott @ dundermifflin.com or something. More likely it's something anonymous. Certainly so if they were planting things to sue over, you can bet they'd use an account like dsfhakeij@ mail.ru or something.