←back to thread

468 points speckx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.379s | source
Show context
Aurornis ◴[] No.45302320[source]
I thought the conclusion should have been obvious: A cluster of Raspberry Pi units is an expensive nerd indulgence for fun, not an actual pathway to high performance compute. I don’t know if anyone building a Pi cluster actually goes into it thinking it’s going to be a cost effective endeavor, do they? Maybe this is just YouTube-style headline writing spilling over to the blog for the clicks.

If your goal is to play with or learn on a cluster of Linux machines, the cost effective way to do it is to buy a desktop consumer CPU, install a hypervisor, and create a lot of VMs. It’s not as satisfying as plugging cables into different Raspberry Pi units and connecting them all together if that’s your thing, but once you’re in the terminal the desktop CPU, RAM, and flexibility of the system will be appreciated.

replies(11): >>45302356 #>>45302424 #>>45302433 #>>45302531 #>>45302676 #>>45302770 #>>45303057 #>>45303061 #>>45303424 #>>45304502 #>>45304568 #
randomNumber7 ◴[] No.45304502[source]
What I think is strange with stuff like this that you should be able to come to that conclusion without technical knowledge. Just the fact that everyone runs AI on GPUs and NVIDIAs stock skyrocketed since the AI boom should tell you s.th..

Did OP really think his fellow humans are that moronic that they just didn't find out you can plug in together a cuple of rasperri pis?

replies(1): >>45304968 #
1. rustyminnow ◴[] No.45304968[source]
Nobody thought an RPI cluster would ever be competitive, and Geerling never expected anybody would. But it's fun to play "what if" and then make the thing just to see how it stacks up and that's his job. Any implication or suggestion of this being a good idea is just part of the story telling.