←back to thread

659 points jolux | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
1. raesene9 ◴[] No.45302039[source]
If they're trying to strengthen security, this feels like an odd way to go about it.

Making unplanned unexpected changes to GitHub ownership and removing people with lots of experience and institutional knowledge with little notice (based on the original story) and presumably no great hand-over, feels risky and not a great way to improve people's trust in their governance.