←back to thread

461 points LaurenSerino | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
graemep ◴[] No.45290469[source]
There is a problem with rigid medical definitions. There is a huge difference between the author of this, a young pregnant woman losing her husband, and say, something like a middle aged person losing an elderly parent (as I did earlier this year). Of course it will take her far longer to recover (if at all).

I would guess her grief is not "disordered" though. As she says she functions - she works, she looks after her child, she looks after herself.

> We medicalize grief because we fear it.

Absolutely right. There is a certain cowardice in how we deal with death in the contemporary west.

replies(9): >>45290594 #>>45290746 #>>45290773 #>>45290870 #>>45290903 #>>45290960 #>>45291953 #>>45292494 #>>45298820 #
pizzathyme ◴[] No.45290960[source]
I'm so sorry for your loss. I agree with what you say about "disordered", the language is hostile.

In a less morbid area, I feel the same way about ADHD - "attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder". For some people this is problematic, but others can function fine and happily with this.

In those cases, why is it a "disorder"? Why can't it just be "how some people are"?

replies(6): >>45291315 #>>45291548 #>>45292651 #>>45299160 #>>45301647 #>>45303372 #
1. basisword ◴[] No.45301647[source]
>> For some people this is problematic, but others can function fine and happily with this.

In that case I would say it’s not ADHD, which as its name suggests is disordered. If the ADH part isn’t negatively impacting your life why would it require a diagnosis?