←back to thread

291 points mooreds | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
darth_avocado ◴[] No.45291550[source]
America needs more land that’s under stewardship of people who want to conserve it for the future. We’ve lost so much native biodiversity, but there’s still pockets that can revive it if managed appropriately.
replies(4): >>45291691 #>>45291720 #>>45291878 #>>45291956 #
BeetleB ◴[] No.45291878[source]
In the early 80's, Congress passed some laws that allow people to buy undeveloped land, and declare it to be undeveloped for perpetuity (no one can develop on it even if sold). The owner gets some tax benefits from doing so.

It became a niche segment in the real estate. The idea is you find land that is cheap, but you have a feeling it has mineral wealth. You buy it cheap, get the survey done, and show that it was really worth a lot more. But instead of building a mine/oil well, you declare the land undeveloped for perpetuity. The tax benefit you receive is commensurate to the (now highly increased) value of the land.

You make a profit this way, and the environment benefits.

It's a very risky part of real estate. There are lots of environmental groups who closely monitor the land, and will file a lawsuit if they suspect you are developing on the land. Fighting lawsuits is part of the risk.

Anyway, the person who did the presentation showed some interesting statistics. Supposedly, for every 10 acres of land that is developed in a given year, roughly 9 acres are declared undevelopable for perpetuity. That's really significant (if true).

replies(4): >>45292634 #>>45292704 #>>45292759 #>>45292802 #
bix6 ◴[] No.45292704[source]
I go back and forth on this. I love the idea of preserving land but this also seems to be a way for the wealthy to insulate their home eg buy 10 acres next to your house and declare it undeveloped. Now you get an amazing property in a pristine zone that nobody can touch all while getting a tax break you don’t need and boxing out the next generation.
replies(5): >>45292778 #>>45293025 #>>45293245 #>>45294684 #>>45297746 #
1. silversmith ◴[] No.45293025{3}[source]
All the while foxes, deer and birds can still develop their dwellings there. Blatant disregard of the law, I say.
replies(1): >>45293322 #
2. bix6 ◴[] No.45293322[source]
Yeah come on it only takes a year and a little donation to get permits! Just stand in line little fox.
replies(1): >>45293699 #
3. potato3732842 ◴[] No.45293699[source]
Try $50k and 1-3yr. More if you're doing something other than residential. You can thank the EPA for that. Can't do get approval without a plan for the stormwater. Can't do that without engineers. Engineers won't draw and stamp without surveys and the like.

Mega-corps building cookie cutter subdivisions or commercial space obviously pay less because they're vertically integrated and highly streamlined.

Some small scale 1-4 unit stuff (single structure here and there) is exempted, unless it's too close to water of course.