←back to thread

291 points mooreds | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
lclc ◴[] No.45291739[source]
So before nobody had access and it wasn't used, so left to nature. Now everyone can go there. Is that really better?
replies(3): >>45291770 #>>45291943 #>>45292096 #
1. munificent ◴[] No.45291943[source]
Yes, it is.

This land is only preserved from development because people are willing to pay taxes for the government to monitor and fence the land, and pay higher property values because there's less land for development.

If you want people to be OK with those costs, it really helps for them to be able to actually go and see the beautiful land that they are preserving. It's not reasonable to expect people to care about nature of you don't let them experience it.