←back to thread

291 points mooreds | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
pixelpoet ◴[] No.45291451[source]
> one of the only

That reminds me, I still have to put up the explanation at oneoftheonly.com for why this phrase doesn't make sense and is the new "could care less".

replies(9): >>45291462 #>>45291488 #>>45291513 #>>45291551 #>>45291558 #>>45291634 #>>45291684 #>>45291917 #>>45292615 #
idreyn ◴[] No.45291488[source]
I would like a non-native speaker to weigh in, but I gloss it as "there are ONLY a few and this is ONE OF them" and have never found that confusing or contradictory.
replies(3): >>45291565 #>>45291604 #>>45291834 #
1. em-bee ◴[] No.45291834[source]
as a nonnative fluent speaker, to me "one of the few" and "one of the only" mean the same thing, with "of the only" possibly being even less than "of the few"