←back to thread

2071 points JustSkyfall | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.444s | source
Show context
Hobadee ◴[] No.45286056[source]
This isn't just you. We have quite a few clients in this same boat. (One client is migrating to Teams in a couple of weeks for this exact reason.) We have quite a few RIA clients, and because of archiving requirements, this is happening to every single one of them. These aren't poor companies, but Slack is making it really hard to justify the expense anymore. We will have quite a few companies dump them when renewal comes around.
replies(2): >>45286088 #>>45286255 #
beezlewax ◴[] No.45286088[source]
Because microsoft would never do such a thing
replies(6): >>45286149 #>>45286150 #>>45286330 #>>45286397 #>>45286617 #>>45288079 #
ivell ◴[] No.45286150[source]
With moving to Azure and other MS tech, I am seeing companies consolidating their IT to mainly a single vendor. This is going to be a very risky situation, with MS having significant leverage over companies (in some cases ability to bankrupt the company if desired).
replies(1): >>45286366 #
SXX ◴[] No.45286366[source]
Millions of businesses were also running single-vendor on Microsoft two decades ago back when they been much larger monopoly.

And I might not like MS tech, but I never heard any stories of rug-pulls and pricing changing x10 overnight.

replies(3): >>45286456 #>>45286604 #>>45288066 #
1. whizzter ◴[] No.45288066[source]
That was until someone decided to start strong arming people with dissenting opinions via compromised companies.

https://www.heise.de/en/news/Criminal-Court-Microsoft-s-emai...