←back to thread

1720 points JustSkyfall | 2 comments | | HN request time: 1.274s | source
Show context
tux3 ◴[] No.45286853[source]
That's a 40x increase all at once with a very short grace period, it's bait-and-switch territory.

If only 2.5% of targets pay the ransom, Slack breaks even on this racket, so in absence of any protection this strategy is most likely profitable for Slack.

This is something you pull if you want to squeeze in the short term, and don't mind losing customers.

replies(4): >>45286925 #>>45287003 #>>45287442 #>>45289326 #
Barbing ◴[] No.45287003[source]
Thanks for doing the math. Imagine being the analyst who was paid to optimize this or (infinitely worse?) the executive who demanded it.
replies(2): >>45287112 #>>45288431 #
1. raxxorraxor ◴[] No.45287112[source]
Should be enough for the state to take custody of their kids.
replies(1): >>45288313 #
2. dijit ◴[] No.45288313[source]
What? No? Why?