←back to thread

1502 points JustSkyfall | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.564s | source
Show context
tux3 ◴[] No.45286853[source]
That's a 40x increase all at once with a very short grace period, it's bait-and-switch territory.

If only 2.5% of targets pay the ransom, Slack breaks even on this racket, so in absence of any protection this strategy is most likely profitable for Slack.

This is something you pull if you want to squeeze in the short term, and don't mind losing customers.

replies(3): >>45286925 #>>45287003 #>>45287442 #
timeon ◴[] No.45286925[source]
Was not obvious before but these days it is: choosing VC-backed service is very risky.
replies(1): >>45286951 #
1. scrollaway ◴[] No.45286951[source]
Slack is not a VC backed service right now. It is owned in full by Salesforce.

Now you can argue choosing a Salesforce product is not a good idea and that I agree with.