←back to thread

1502 points JustSkyfall | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
wpm ◴[] No.45284156[source]
I can sympathize, but this was always the end deal for cloud SaaS apps. Give em a taste, get em hooked, get years of institutional knowledge and process embedded in the app, refuse to let them export it, and crank the price up.

It's not only guys named Larry who are lawnmowers. Don't stick your hand in. *Own* your shit. Be suspicious of anyone who tries to convince you not to. If it's "easy" it might come back to bite you.

Even if some self-hostable software stack does a rug pull and changes the license, you just don't have to update. You can go log into the database and export to whatever format you want.

replies(8): >>45284319 #>>45284486 #>>45284621 #>>45284645 #>>45284726 #>>45284734 #>>45284830 #>>45285638 #
ainiriand ◴[] No.45285638[source]
Seriously, 40 bucks a month gets you a great server at Hetzner then you can have mattermost there and many other office utilities.
replies(2): >>45286043 #>>45286638 #
1. baq ◴[] No.45286043[source]
Only if sysadmin time is $0/h.

I’ve nothing against self hosting, but it isn’t necessarily cheaper than saas just because you can get amazing amounts of hardware for what amounts to a rounding error in accounting.