←back to thread

1332 points Qem | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.32s | source
Show context
MangoToupe ◴[] No.45267350[source]
I'm afraid the latest spate of "recognizing the state of Palestine" is not, in fact, a sign of coming relief for the people there, but rather a spigot to relieve domestic pressure to engage in substantive actions (sanctions, pressuring the US and other suppliers of arms to engage in sanctions, let alone sending peacekeepers or no-fly zones).

Regardless of how much you're personally invested in the topic, this should break the hearts of everyone who dreamed that the international community could hold each other legally accountable. Indeed, the US would rather sanction individuals at the ICJ than acknowledge any sort of legitimacy—even as our own politicians accuse Russia of engaging in "war crimes". I have no doubt that they are, in fact, I think that the evidence is quite damning. But the double standard is striking, as is the difference between the footage visible on social media and what is acknowledged when you turn on the TV or open the paper.

replies(6): >>45267394 #>>45268454 #>>45269223 #>>45271093 #>>45272866 #>>45280009 #
nialv7 ◴[] No.45269223[source]
> break the hearts of everyone who dreamed that the international community could hold each other legally accountable.

this is never going to happen. there is just no practical enforcement mechanism. laws and police works within a sovereign country because the state has the monopoly on violence, this is not true on the international stage. no country will go into war to enforce an ICC/ICJ conviction.

replies(2): >>45270544 #>>45285856 #
1. amdivia ◴[] No.45285856[source]
I'm illiterate on international law, but does anything exist/is similar to the UN's peace keeping forces but for the enforcement of judicial decisions on the international scale?