←back to thread

1502 points JustSkyfall | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
flunhat ◴[] No.45284272[source]
For whatever reason, Salesforce has failed to capitalize on the AI excitement/craze [1]. Its earnings growth is just not what it used to be (i.e. during the peak cloud era of 2010s-202x).

A move this aggressive (e.g. pushing companies on Slack to pay 10x more, immediately, or get lost) is not isolated and probably the result of institutional forces. It's not like the random sales person in charge of this decided to be destructive. Salesforce the company is getting squeezed and this is one of the outgrowths of that pressure. And it speaks to the insane dysfunction that must be taking place in the bowels of Salesforce right now, I'm sure it's crazy.

[1] https://qz.com/salesforce-beats-q2-earnings-ai

replies(4): >>45284396 #>>45284802 #>>45284807 #>>45286022 #
MontyCarloHall ◴[] No.45284807[source]
It's really surprising -- Slack is the poster child of an app where AI-based semantic search (e.g. RAG) would be incredibly useful. Yet despite Marc Benioff's grand proclamations about AI [0, 1], you barely see any AI integration into one of Salesforce's most universally-used products.

[0] https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2025-09-02/salesforce...

[1] https://www.fastcompany.com/91359024/salesforce-using-ai-art...

replies(3): >>45284855 #>>45285511 #>>45285776 #
1. aurareturn ◴[] No.45285511[source]
I don't understand why Slack hasn't fully implemented LLMs. Imagine as a new comer, you don't understand why a product decision was made 3 years ago. You ask Slack to summarize the conversations on why this choice was made based on messages 3 years ago. How powerful is that?

Slack can probably charge an extra $10/month/user for this.

replies(3): >>45285824 #>>45285829 #>>45288197 #
2. SchemaLoad ◴[] No.45285824[source]
Has any company got this feature? Sounds like the kind of thing that sounds good in theory but is hard to actually pull off. To complete this query you'd have to process almost the entirety of the chat history in every channel. Which sounds extremely expensive, and we know LLMs start to go off the rails when you give them too much context.
3. atemerev ◴[] No.45285829[source]
Because implementing _useful_ AI features is hard.
replies(1): >>45288046 #
4. aurareturn ◴[] No.45288046[source]
What do you think is hard about it? What do you think Slack needs to do to enable this feature?
5. paxys ◴[] No.45288197[source]
Slack does have this. Basic AI summaries are included in all paid plans, and AI search and other features are part of the $20/mo plan.