←back to thread

Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year

(skyfall.dev)
1806 points JustSkyfall | 1 comments | 18 Sep 25 01:37 UTC | HN request time: 0.328s | source
Show context
wpm ◴[18 Sep 25 02:03 UTC] No.45284156[source]▶
I can sympathize, but this was always the end deal for cloud SaaS apps. Give em a taste, get em hooked, get years of institutional knowledge and process embedded in the app, refuse to let them export it, and crank the price up.

It's not only guys named Larry who are lawnmowers. Don't stick your hand in. *Own* your shit. Be suspicious of anyone who tries to convince you not to. If it's "easy" it might come back to bite you.

Even if some self-hostable software stack does a rug pull and changes the license, you just don't have to update. You can go log into the database and export to whatever format you want.

replies(8): >>45284319 #>>45284486 #>>45284621 #>>45284645 #>>45284726 #>>45284734 #>>45284830 #>>45285638 #
1. BrenBarn ◴[18 Sep 25 02:50 UTC] No.45284645[source]▶
It's not just cloud SaaS apps, it's everything that is based on unbounded transactions. Every subscription-model service, every Uber-like service, every social media site, every "free" email provider, everything. If you have to pay more than once for the same thing you're at risk.

It's certainly true that some providers are worse than others, but I don't think any of them are "safe" in the long term. Self-hosting is one solution, but even apart from that, a competitive market of multiple providers makes rugpulls like this less likely, because in such an environment even people who are not directly screwed may decide to jump ship to avoid being screwed later.