←back to thread

223 points mindingnever | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
impossiblefork ◴[] No.45279816[source]
Very strange writing from semafor.com

>For instance, an agency could pay for a subscription or negotiate a pay-per-use contract with an AI provider, only to find out that it is prohibited from using the AI model in certain ways, limiting its value.

This is of course quite false. They of course know the restriction when they sign the contract.

replies(5): >>45280028 #>>45280048 #>>45280152 #>>45280390 #>>45280820 #
matula ◴[] No.45280028[source]
There are (or at least WERE) entire divisions dedicated to reading every letter of the contract and terms of service, and usually creating 20 page documents seeking clarification for a specific phrase. They absolutely know what they're getting into.
replies(4): >>45280071 #>>45280084 #>>45280529 #>>45281039 #
1. dannyisaphantom ◴[] No.45280529[source]
Can confirm these teams are still around. There is now an additional "SME review group" that must comb through any and all AI-related issues that were flagged, sends it back down for edits and must give final approval for before docs are sent over to provider for response. Turnaround has gotten much slower (relatively)
replies(1): >>45281189 #
2. gowld ◴[] No.45281189[source]
Or you can use personal accounts to bypass red tape for government business.