←back to thread

1332 points Qem | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ipaddr ◴[] No.45267137[source]
Wonder why this made the frontpage when other political articles die.

Has the rules around political non technical articles changed? Can we get an Epstein thread for the frontpage sometime this week?

replies(6): >>45267159 #>>45267311 #>>45267868 #>>45268417 #>>45268490 #>>45268612 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45268612[source]
For me, this is meaningful because for the first time a legitimate international body is calling this a genocide.

Previously, it’s been activists and claims that this might be genocide. I haven’t read the report yet. But I will, and I intend to leave my mind open as to whether this raises the profile of this war in my mind relative to domestic issues.

replies(3): >>45268691 #>>45268906 #>>45271918 #
dotancohen ◴[] No.45268906[source]
Go read this UNHCR report. All the evidence is just circular references to other bodies who reference each other. The most damning thing they could pin on Israel was that "Israel admits 83% of the casualties are civilians". That idea was because Israel could name 17% of the casualties in Hamas registers as members of the organization. But assuming that every other casualty is a civilian is quite a stretch. For one thing, Israel doesn't know the name of every militant it kills while he's aiming an RPG at them. For another, there are many other militant organizations in the strip, notably the Islamic Jihad. For a third, typically 75% - 90% of the casualties of war are civilians by the UN's own numbers.
replies(4): >>45269503 #>>45271039 #>>45273449 #>>45273572 #
mjburgess ◴[] No.45273449[source]
Here's an interview with a UNICEF worker who has spent a great deal of time on the ground:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsAo2j6aih0

This is not about israel incidentally hitting civilians. It's about the deliberate policy of mass starvation, withholding of water, withholding of medical supplies (incubators, pain killers, the lot), and the placing of the only "allowed" aid-distribution centres (4 out of a previous 400) in the middle of active war zones -- so that to recieve any aid at all, you have to go through active fire.

This has nothing to do with israel's actions against Hamas.

There's a very large list of actions that can only be targeted against the civilian population, and have aimed-at and realised a genocide.

replies(1): >>45274314 #
diordiderot ◴[] No.45274314[source]
It's a bit of a catch-22.

Sending food wherever, leads to it being captured by Hamas / local militias (for lack of a better word) so you have to distribute where you can protect it.

But of course where you have soldiers is where you'll take fire.

Maybe she cared about your own people, you wouldn't engage in places where humanitarian aid was being distributed

replies(2): >>45274480 #>>45274580 #
1. mjburgess ◴[] No.45274480[source]
I'd invite you to watch the interview, all of this is addressed. The israeli placement of 4 aid distribution centres (out of the required and initial 400) has nothing to do with hamas.