←back to thread

1332 points Qem | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
cryptoegorophy[dead post] ◴[] No.45269059[source]
[flagged]
runarberg ◴[] No.45269204[source]
I don’t believe questions like that are asked in good faith. Maybe you are the exception, but I have seen too many people begin with exactly this question, and then end up justifying the Gaza genocide.

In case you are asking in good faith—and following the HN guidelines—I suggest you abandon this question and consider that maybe this is the wrong question to ask given the situation. If that is hard, then I ask you to consider that indigenous resistance against settler colonial violence has been a pretext for countless colonial oppression in the past, including many genocides.

replies(1): >>45269722 #
_DeadFred_ ◴[] No.45269722[source]
Calling someone directly out/impugning their motives instead of responding is actually a violation of the HN guidelines. You can respond to topics, not posters. You are the one in violation.

This isn't the first time I've seem this 'you aren't in good faith' response on this topic, and is partly why again, HN just isn't a place where a real discussion can be had on this subject.

replies(1): >>45270618 #
runarberg ◴[] No.45270618[source]
I want to be clear that my first sentence was speaking generally and not accusing my parent directly of being in bad faith. And in keeping with the spirit of HN I responded to my parent assuming good faith.

Otherwise you are right, I have accused others of being in bad faith on this topic, however when I do so, I tend to do it after many more interactions than what I have had with my parent above.

replies(2): >>45270774 #>>45272173 #
1. _DeadFred_ ◴[] No.45272173[source]
'Maybe you are the exception' isn't keeping in the spirit. You definitely called the person out lowkey without calling them out, then told them the question they asked was off limits instead of answering it, justifying violence in the process.