←back to thread

1332 points Qem | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
ipaddr ◴[] No.45267137[source]
Wonder why this made the frontpage when other political articles die.

Has the rules around political non technical articles changed? Can we get an Epstein thread for the frontpage sometime this week?

replies(6): >>45267159 #>>45267311 #>>45267868 #>>45268417 #>>45268490 #>>45268612 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45268612[source]
For me, this is meaningful because for the first time a legitimate international body is calling this a genocide.

Previously, it’s been activists and claims that this might be genocide. I haven’t read the report yet. But I will, and I intend to leave my mind open as to whether this raises the profile of this war in my mind relative to domestic issues.

replies(3): >>45268691 #>>45268906 #>>45271918 #
1. mpweiher ◴[] No.45271918[source]
Go look at the report and the org and the people in it.

There is nothing "legitimate" about it.

The head of this alleged body is a staunch anti-Israel activist who is not taken seriously.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navi_Pillay#Israel-Gaza_confli...

"On 25 July 2014, the United States Congress published a letter addressed to Pillay by over 100 members in which the signatories asserted that the Human Rights Council "cannot be taken seriously as a human rights organisation" over their handling of the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict "