Dismissing AI use often assumes everyone has equal access to high-quality education, time for extensive writing practice, or native fluency in the language they're writing in
It can privilege traditional forms of cultural capital and educational background
May ignore legitimate accessibility needs - AI can be genuinely helpful for people with dyslexia, ADHD, or other learning differences
Potentially discriminatory elements:
Could disproportionately affect non-native speakers who use AI to help with grammar, style, or cultural communication norms
May unfairly impact people from different socioeconomic backgrounds who didn't have the same writing instruction opportunities
However, not all criticism is inherently biased:
Concerns about academic integrity in educational settings can be legitimate Worries about skill development and learning are valid in many contexts Professional standards in certain fields may reasonably require human-generated work Transparency about AI use is often a fair expectation
--- ----
acutally, above answer is from AI, what do you think about it?