←back to thread

Hosting a website on a disposable vape

(bogdanthegeek.github.io)
1386 points BogdanTheGeek | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
SXX ◴[] No.45250676[source]
Talking of cheap and powerful devices one can also look at Chinese UZ801 4G LTE (Qualcomm MSM8916) dongles. They cost like only $4-5 and pack quite impressive HW: 4GB eMMC, 512MB RAM, actual 4G modem sometimes with 2 sim switching support. Since it's actually old Android SOC there is even GPU and GPS in there. And a lot of work was already done on supporting them:

https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Zhihe_series_LTE_dongles_...

https://github.com/OpenStick/OpenStick

So yeah if you looking for hardware platform for weird homelab projects that's can be it.

replies(13): >>45251087 #>>45251521 #>>45251613 #>>45252249 #>>45252358 #>>45253076 #>>45253803 #>>45254159 #>>45254425 #>>45256355 #>>45256875 #>>45259550 #>>45264049 #
Telemakhos ◴[] No.45256875[source]
> 4GB eMMC, 512MB RAM

And, that Snapdragon is 1.4 GHz, I think.

That's enough for a bare-bones WordPress installation.

My first laptop had a 100 MB had drive, 8 MB of RAM, and a 25 MHz processor, and I remember running a web server on it too, in addition to Windows 3.11 and word processors and other software. One of those dongles would have been godlike power back in those days.

I feel like somewhere along the way scripting got out of hand. Stuff like Wordpress is absurdly resource intensive.

replies(3): >>45260006 #>>45260575 #>>45260634 #
oblio ◴[] No.45260575[source]
Let's not overhype those days. I had a P1 166MHz and playing an MP3 meant everything else would have to be closed, if I'd open Word the song would stutter. Not all modern processing power is wasted.
replies(1): >>45263843 #
Jyaif ◴[] No.45263843{3}[source]
I could play mp3s on a 66Mhz CPU, though yes other tasks would make the playback stutter.
replies(1): >>45264032 #
oblio ◴[] No.45264032{4}[source]
I was doing it on Win 95 or 98, maybe the OS was using more RAM than yours?
replies(1): >>45266712 #
1. Jyaif ◴[] No.45266712{5}[source]
Possibly, I was on System 7.1.