←back to thread

Europe is locking itself in to US LNG

(davekeating.substack.com)
151 points hunglee2 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jsnider3 ◴[] No.45262472[source]
Renewables solves this.
replies(5): >>45262574 #>>45262801 #>>45262945 #>>45263362 #>>45265626 #
probablypower ◴[] No.45262574[source]
This is confidently incorrect.

Gas power generation is a necessary evil to balance out the variability of intermittent energy generation (i.e. wind and solar).

Hydropower isn't a feasible alternative because the easy resources have been developed.

The only alternative source of flexibility available today is demand side response.

Edit: I appreciate the down votes, as I've not explained in detail. It is a complex issue. My opinions are based on having a phd in the topic, 10+ years in control rooms, years of market operations and design, and years contributing to europe-wide risk assessment methodologies.

I emplore anyone who is actually interested in how energy mix actually impacts grid stability/reliability to look into the Eirgrid DS3 programme (https://www.eirgrid.ie/ds3-programme-delivering-secure-susta...).

replies(6): >>45262600 #>>45262621 #>>45262624 #>>45262845 #>>45265133 #>>45268364 #
PunchTornado ◴[] No.45262600[source]
Green energy like nuclear
replies(2): >>45262633 #>>45263401 #
potato3732842 ◴[] No.45262633[source]
Politically hamstrung because a bunch of short sighted people have their panties in a bunch?
replies(1): >>45262884 #
1. SiempreViernes ◴[] No.45262884[source]
Mostly because it's very expensive and slow to build, what with nuclear engineers not wanting their workplaces to be as dangerous as a construction site. Look up who invented the Maximum Credible Accident, it wasn't the environmentalists.