←back to thread

989 points heavyset_go | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.465s | source | bottom
Show context
alberth[dead post] ◴[] No.45261586[source]
[flagged]
1. maz1b ◴[] No.45261643[source]
By this logic, anyone who has had a Google Pixel and or is running GrapheneOS is guilty by association, right?

Just wanted to understand your point.

replies(2): >>45261688 #>>45263645 #
2. IlikeKitties ◴[] No.45261688[source]
> By this logic, anyone who has had a Google Pixel and or is running GrapheneOS is guilty by association, right?

Yup. https://www.androidauthority.com/google-pixel-organized-crim...

replies(1): >>45261833 #
3. Aurornis ◴[] No.45261833[source]
The source for that article was a single cop in a single country (Spain) making an off-handed comment. The way it’s been spun as a universal concept in Europe by all of the Android blogs is misleading.
replies(1): >>45262041 #
4. axus ◴[] No.45262041{3}[source]
Would you predict that GrapheneOS will still be completely legal in 10 years in Spain?
replies(1): >>45262703 #
5. Aurornis ◴[] No.45262703{4}[source]
Yes. I think that one comment was a flash in the pan about a particular moment in time from an officer involved in a very specific type of drug trafficking prosecutions.
6. alberth ◴[] No.45263645[source]
There's a big difference between being the user of something (Pixel/GrapheneOS, though I find these as weird comparisons given) and being an operator of something.

Operating an exit node is by definition you acting in the distribution of such activity (legal or not).