←back to thread

99 points mitchbob | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
yannyu ◴[] No.45252221[source]
In addition to everything that is terrifying about Kilmar Ábrego García's case, we have the VP and President of this country making clearly biased remarks on an active criminal case against a resident of the United States who is married to a US citizen. Is there a more clear case of violation of due process and civil rights?
replies(2): >>45252596 #>>45254008 #
nickff ◴[] No.45252596[source]
>" the VP and President of this country making clearly biased remarks on an active criminal case against a resident of the United States"

I am sorry to break it to you, but this happens all the time, and is not a violation of due process. You can find examples of many Presidents declaring opinions on the guilt or innocence of a variety of people before their trials. [1] It makes sense that this is allowed, as the Justice Department is a part of the Executive Branch, so all prosecutions are done with the tacit or explicit approval of the President. It would be more problematic if the judges in the case expressed views on guilt or innocence before hearing the case.

[1] https://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2011/04/25/obama-decla...

replies(4): >>45252651 #>>45252666 #>>45252667 #>>45252763 #
1. southernplaces7 ◴[] No.45252666[source]
Trump and his circus of hacks & morons might be one of the most egregious cases in years of an administration doing this, but what you say is true, many previous presidents have poked their political hands into stirring the judicial pot of trying to paint culpability where it hasn't been legally established yet. It's a shame the brainless hie mind decides to downvote this, as they do for all kinds of things they just don't want touching their sensitive little eyes.
replies(1): >>45252686 #
2. ◴[] No.45252686[source]