←back to thread

Hosting a website on a disposable vape

(bogdanthegeek.github.io)
1386 points BogdanTheGeek | 3 comments | 15 Sep 25 17:53 UTC | HN request time: 0.447s | source
Show context
jrmg ◴[14 Sep 25 23:33 UTC] No.45244410[source]▶
I wouldn’t want to be the lawyer who one day will have to argue how a device with USB C and a rechargeable battery can be classified as “disposable”.

I thought the point of making them like this was that they technically are reusable, so they can sell them (to people who for some reason keep buying them and throwing them away!) in places where disposable vapes are banned.

replies(4): >>45244503 #>>45244510 #>>45244661 #>>45244745 #
Zak ◴[15 Sep 25 00:10 UTC] No.45244661[source]▶
I'm confused by why anybody would buy one of these when entirely reusable versions exist, but then vaping seems unwise to me in general except as a way to quit tobacco.
replies(5): >>45244719 #>>45244875 #>>45245707 #>>45246277 #>>45246547 #
jimmaswell ◴[15 Sep 25 03:08 UTC] No.45245707[source]▶
Vaping nicotine doesn't seem that bad to me. AFAICT the dangers outside simple addictiveness are moderate lung irritation and cardiovascular effects, but no strong evidence of cancer caused by vaping alone - far better than cigarettes, and still better than an equivalent drinking problem.
replies(6): >>45245943 #>>45245949 #>>45246357 #>>45246866 #>>45257133 #>>45262499 #
xp84 ◴[15 Sep 25 03:53 UTC] No.45245943[source]▶
This is why to me it’s so damn disappointing to me that vaping is targeted so forcefully by the various scolds in the “regulate everything” camp when smoking isn’t yet eradicated. Things like banning flavor and stuff. They want it to be as unpleasant as tobacco, which reduces the likelihood of people switching from tobacco to vaping, killing many of those smokers as a way to “save” teens from taking up an overall not-very-dangerous habit.
replies(4): >>45246090 #>>45246152 #>>45246191 #>>45247125 #
1. rasse ◴[15 Sep 25 04:22 UTC] No.45246090[source]▶
There are numerous other options for supporting smoking cessation that do not risk lung injury.
replies(2): >>45247181 #>>45252225 #
2. dns_snek ◴[15 Sep 25 07:49 UTC] No.45247181[source]▶
Counter-point: For someone who's used to smoking or vaping, the craving to "take a puff" can be a very strong, maybe stronger than the chemical dependence on nicotine itself.

I noticed that in myself when I was trying to quit, vaping nicotine-free liquids helped my cravings more than nicotine itself. It didn't help the physical withdrawal symptoms but it mysteriously stopped the cravings for a while.

3. xp84 ◴[15 Sep 25 17:05 UTC] No.45252225[source]▶
Sure, and removing one appealing option that many people like still means some people will keep smoking who would have quit.