←back to thread

1041 points mpweiher | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rallyforthesun ◴[] No.45226520[source]
I read a lot of comments talking about „getting down the operational costs“ but i am missing someone talking about the costs of depositing the nuclear waste until it has no more risks. Am i missing something?!
replies(1): >>45227761 #
1. throwawayffffas ◴[] No.45227761[source]
Yes the cost of depositing nuclear waste is trivial, it takes a small number of large concrete structures underground in well picked locations.

The US produces about 1250 cubic meters of waste per year. For comparison the empire state building has a floor area of 208000 square meters, assuming a 3 meter floor height you could fit about 500 years worth of spent fuel inside it.

replies(1): >>45230162 #
2. m101 ◴[] No.45230162[source]
Yes. This. Nuclear waste storage is extremely cheap.

Also, we only "use" 3% of the fuel in current nuclear power station designs so we could just reprocess the fuel and vastly reduce the volume of waste too.