←back to thread

1041 points mpweiher | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
yellowapple ◴[] No.45225313[source]
[flagged]
replies(12): >>45225401 #>>45225408 #>>45225486 #>>45225487 #>>45225540 #>>45225582 #>>45225601 #>>45225657 #>>45225689 #>>45225714 #>>45227579 #>>45228776 #
V__ ◴[] No.45225582[source]
I agree that the fears are overblown, but at the same time the hype for nuclear is just weird. It's more complex, more expensive, less adjustable and more risky. Even the new hip small modular reactors are many years away.

The LCOE (Levelized Cost of Electricity) for solar with battery is already better than current solutions, and dropping. Wind and battery closely following. There is no way that nuclear technology will be able to compete on price in the foreseeable future.

replies(6): >>45225618 #>>45225651 #>>45225662 #>>45225749 #>>45226158 #>>45226373 #
oceanplexian ◴[] No.45225618[source]
How is the hype for a limitless clean energy source, something that could benefit every aspect of humanity more than any other invention in human history considered “weird”?
replies(3): >>45225658 #>>45225666 #>>45225865 #
V__ ◴[] No.45225658[source]
Because this limitless clean energy source is too expensive, even though it had 60+ years time. I hope the day fusion energy finally has its big breakthrough isn't too far away, but conventional nuclear won't solve our problems.
replies(2): >>45225944 #>>45226732 #
xienze ◴[] No.45226732[source]
> Because this limitless clean energy source is too expensive

I’m laughing in $0.11/kWh nuclear energy while Germany’s “cheaper” green energy is uh... quite a bit more expensive.

replies(1): >>45227140 #
V__ ◴[] No.45227140[source]
Retail or production price, where are you based?
replies(1): >>45227313 #
1. xienze ◴[] No.45227313[source]
In the US, the price I’m metered at.